Crowd at city hall paid off
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
Last week’s city council meeting and public hearing were prime examples of the power of a community (I can’t stress this word enough) actively getting together on an issue.
Council chambers were about as packed as I’ve ever seen them during my time at the Chronicle. The crowd was there to provide input on the proposed lighting ordinance that I imagine many of our readers are intimately aware of now. I saw posters, heard some constructive dialogue and some pretty heated exchanges. But, for the most part, conversation stayed on rails and ended in a positive result. As someone who tends to lean sympathetic when it comes to dark sky policies, I highly appreciated the perspectives on the issue from both schools of thought.
I think what was most refreshing was the fact that the stances of many people, no matter their opinion on dark skies, tended to vibe after shedding away the emotional, personal and political investments. Dark sky policies tend to be a hot button issue in small towns, and for obvious reasons.